State ex rel. Gillie v. Warren

While the focal point of this action is directed toward the recovery of moneys paid to a Municipal Court judge under a Common Pleas Court ruling, several peripheral issues will be disposed of first.

Respondent initially argues that the relator is actually seeking to have this court enjoin the further deduction of $50 from his pay every two weeks; that an action of this nature would characteristically fall in the category of in-junctive proceedings; and that mandamus will not lie as presented here.

In support of his contention, respondent cites the case of State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus.…