Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City Municipal Improvement Authority v. HTB, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1989No. 65517, 65766 to 65768 and 65866Published

1Opinion of the Court

769 P.2d 131 (1988)

The OKLAHOMA CITY MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, a public trust, and the trustees thereof, the City of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation, and the Oklahoma City Municipal Facilities Authority, a public trust, and the trustees thereof, Appellants,

v.

HTB, INC., Interpace Corp., GHA Lock Joint, Inc., P.S.A.T., Inc., Phelps, Spitz, Ammerman & Thomas, Inc., Phelps & Spitz, Inc., Painter & Spitz, Inc., Brooks Collier, Ingram & Spitz, Inc., Frederick J. Spitz, Project Construction Co., the Concho Co., Brewer Construction Co., PCB, a joint venture, and the Benham Group, Inc.,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API