Legal Opinion

Nathan v. Oakland Park Supermarket, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1972No. 47087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. For a statement of the salient facts of this case see Nathan v. Oakland Park Supermarket, 123 Ga. App. 591 (181 SE2d 878) where the grant of summary judgment for the defendant was reversed. On the trial the evidence supported the plaintiff’s position that as she was exiting from a supermarket she fell and injured herself, that immediately thereafter one of the defendant’s employees removed a candy wrapper from her foot and stated that he had seen it lying there previously and had intended to pick it up but had forgotten to do so. Evidence that the part of the sidewalk where the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Misenhamer v. PharrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Tinley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Conaway v. McCrory Stores Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Southern Mills, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Pfeifer v. Yellow Cab Co. of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piggly-Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API