White v. Hatcher
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Conrt of Davidson County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court.— John Allison, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
This is a suit by the indorsee of several promissory notes, claiming to be an innocent holder. The defendant, the maker, admits the execution thereof, hut avers failure of consideration and denies that the notes were negotiable.
There was a decree for the complainant in the court of civil appeals, that court finding him to he an innocent holder and construing the notes sued on to he negotia- ■ hie instruments. A petition for certiorari has been granted and the cause argued here.
All the notes are of like effect and the first is, in words and figures, as follows:
“$25.00. September 15,1913.
“Sixty…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- First National Bank of Elgin v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Iowa National Bank v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Roblee v. Union Stock Yards National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nickell v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
- McCornick & Co. v. Gem State Oil & Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Equipment Acceptance Corp. v. Arwood Can Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Mayor of Morristown v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.