Legal Opinion

Judah v. Goldsmith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1929No. 12,895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action for damages for the alleged alienation, by appellant, of the affections of Bernice M. Goldsmith, the former wife of appellee.

It is alleged in the first paragraph of appellee’s complaint that, on January 1, 1923, and, thereafter, appellant was engaged in the operation of the Willard hotel in the city of Franklin, Indiana; that said Bernice M. Goldsmith was employed at said hotel; that appellant, by means of numerous marks of kindness and affection and by various artifices and devices shown to her, alienated her affections from appellee, and that appellant sustained improper relations…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kern v. BridwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kennegar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Harrold v. FuenfstueckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Annadall v. Union Cement & Lime Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tice v. MandelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Dunlop v. DunlopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Glover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. DeWeese v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API