Legal Opinion

Reid v. White

New York City Family Court

Decided January 20, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. McLaughlin, J.

The court is confronted with a case of first impression. Respondent herein moved for a human leucocyte antigen blood tissue test (HLA test) pursuant to article 5 of the Family Court Act in September of 1981. He failed to appear for the test, which was scheduled on December 3, 1981. On the trial date, January 5, 1982, respondent sought an adjournment. Mindful of the 90-day time standard and two adjournment rule set by the Office of Court Administration, the court refused to grant an adjournment. (Matter of Richard P., 110 Misc 2d 833; Matter of Andre…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In re the Adoption of Malpica-OrsiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. People Ex Rel. Lawton v. . SnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Orsini v. BlasiSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. TamolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Dade v. State, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. LovettAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Helen T. v. Roosevelt B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Carmen V. v. Bruce R.New York City Family Court · 1982
  5. Nassar v. LakeNew York Family Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API