Sholund v. Sholund

Did the order of April 18,1966, provide only for a final division of property, thereby precluding any further provision for the wife ?

The respondent takes the position that the order was for the final division of property only and was not an order for alimony as well. He relies upon see. 247.32, Stats., which provides:

“Revision of judgment. After a judgment providing for alimony or other allowance for the wife and children, or either of them, or for the appointment of trustees as aforesaid the court may, from time to time, on the petition of either of the parties and upon notice to the family…