Legal Opinion

James Rose v. Michael P. Lane

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 6, 1990No. 87-2494PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

James Rose appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. He claims that he was denied due process of law when the trial court gave a jury instruction on the burden of proof that was in violation of state law. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the district court and grant the writ of habeas corpus.

I

The facts in this case are undisputed. On March 16, 1983, Rose shot and killed Tommy Mays. That morning Rose and Mays argued for some time and Mays made threatening statements to Rose. Their paths crossed that afternoon when Rose pulled his car…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. People v. ReddickIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Juan Verdin v. Michael O'Leary and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Kathleen A. Braun v. Barbara PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. People v. ShieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kevin Taylor v. Jerry D. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Jimmy Lee Riggins v. Kenneth R. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API