Legal Opinion

Walker v. Baermann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This is a motion to compel one of the justices of the Municipal 'Court of the city of Mew York to make a further or amended return. The evidence which was taken upon the trial is wholly •omitted from the return before us. In answer to the motion it .is *588made to appear, by the affidavits of the justice and of the official stenographer who took the testimony, that the stenographer took the minutes to the court in August last, with the intention of filing them, but has never since been able to find them. The shorthand notes being lost, he is unable to furnish a transcript of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waterman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Andres v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Kay v. KayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
  4. Lees v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Metal Stamping Co. v. SamuelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API