Savannah & Memphis Rail Road v. Lancaster
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Lee Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. N. S. Graham. Bill for foreclosure of trust deed by the appellees, who describe themselves as follows : Tour orators, Bobert A. Lancaster'and John F. Tanner, as trustees for 'divers parties holding and owning certain bonds and past due coupons thereof, of the Savannah and Memphis Eailroad Company, under and by virtue of a deed of trust executed and delivered to them by said railroad company for the trusts and purposes therein…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lee Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. N. S. Graham. Bill for foreclosure of trust deed by the appellees, who describe themselves as follows : Tour orators, Bobert A. Lancaster'and John F. Tanner, as trustees for 'divers parties holding and owning certain bonds and past due coupons thereof, of the Savannah and Memphis Eailroad Company, under and by virtue of a deed of trust executed and delivered to them by said railroad company for the trusts and purposes therein mentioned; and Abby Harrington, Mason Young, John J. Thomas, Hiram Sibley, Hiram W. Sibley, William A. Had-den, and…
1Opinion of the CourtManning, J.
Plaintiffs are described in the introductory part of their bill as follows : “Your orators, Robert A. Lancaster and John F. Tanner, as trustees for divers parties holding and owning certain bonds and past due coupons thereof, of the Savannah and Memphis Eailroad Company, under and by virtue of a deed of trust executed and delivered to them by said railroad company for the trusts and purposes therein mentioned; and Abby Harrington, Mason Young,” and others named, “ certain holders of said coupon bonds and past due coupons thereof, and cestui que trusts of the trustees aforesaid . . . who join…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Monument National Bank v. Globe WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Duckworth v. Duckworth's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Hays v. Galion Gas Light & Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1876
- Reel v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Montgomery Light Co. v. LaheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Lowenstein v. PhelanNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Griffin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Globe Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Eureka Sawmill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.