Sparks v. Lauritzen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Appellants Alex and Mary Sparks brought this action to impose a constructive trust upon all of the assets in the estate of James Morrow, deceased. It was the theory of appellants’ case that the decedent, during his life time, agreed orally with appellants to devise and bequeath his entire estate to them in return for their promise to make him a member of their family and to permit him to reside with them. The trial court denied all relief and plaintiffs appeal.
Appellants met the decedent, who was then a seaman, in 1949 when he came to their house with his sister Marie to buy a dog. Decedent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gorman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Estate of FloodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Estate of LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Estate of Obernolte v. CaskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Mack v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970