Legal Opinion

United States v. Harpster

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 11, 1991No. 90-20048-01PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for new trial, based upon newly discovered evidence, pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. A hearing was held on the matter on February 22, 1991. For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny defendant’s motion.

Defendant, a local physician, was indicted on fourteen counts of mail fraud by a federal grand jury on June 20, 1990. In counts 1 through 8 of the indictment, defendant was charged with devising a scheme to defraud Employes’ Benefit Association…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States v. Thomas AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. William Wesley HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Energy Mgt. P 26,541 United States of America v. Robert B. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. BrooksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. United States v. Steve StevensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. CavalierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  5. State v. EverettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API