Legal Opinion

Di Bartolo v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.

There is presented to us the question whether under the facts related below, the plaintiffs complied with the statutory conditions precedent to the bringing of an action against the City of New York. The applicable statutes are New York City Administrative Code, § 93d-1.0 (formerly Greater New York Charter, § 149) and Code, section 394a-1.0 (former Charter, § 261). The former section reads — Settlement of Claims — “ The comptroller may require any person presenting for settlement an account or claim for any cause against the city or the board of education to be sworn before him or either of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Casey v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Tolchinsky v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Johannes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Johannes v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bravo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Gonzales v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Shrubsall v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Torres v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Angelo v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API