Legal Opinion

Angelo v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 28, 1946Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The plaintiff after the dismissal without prejudice of the first action could, within one year, commence another action. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 23.) The opinion at Special Term in Bellinger v. German Insurance Co. (51 Misc. 463), adopted by the Appellate Division in affirming (113 App. Div. 917), and affirmed in the Court of Appeals (189 N. Y. 533) sets forth the reasons why section 10 of the Civil Practice Act *371does not apply to section 23 of the Civil Practice Act. The latter section is not deemed to be one of the Statutes of Limitation specified in section 10. Like…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Russo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Titus v. . PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Conolly v. . HyamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Bellinger v. German Insurance Co.New York Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McGovern v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API