Legal Opinion

Muncy v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) appeals from that part of a circuit court judgment awarding claimant an attorney’s fee of $1,000.

As its assignment of error SAIF contends that the attorney’s fee was neither proper nor reasonable.

The essential facts are as follows:

Claimant, a deputy sheriff for Multnomah County, *785filed a claim for compensation with SAIF contending that infectious mononucleosis followed by symptoms of G-uillain-Barre syndrome with mononucleosis, from which he had suffered, qualified as an occupational disease. The claim was denied by SAIF, and claimant filed a request…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Newbern v. Gas-Ice CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Giese v. Safeway StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of ColbathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Stevens v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. AnlaufCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API