Atchison, T. S. F. R. Co. v. Sun Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Action by the Sun Drilling Company against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company and the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment against each ■ defendant, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
'Opinion by
HOOKER, 0.
From the record here it appears that, on April 1, 1907, the 'Sun-Drilling Company was engaged in the business of drilling oil and gas wells for hire, and that it owned certain machinery which' it used for said purpose; and in the operation of its business near Bristow, then Indian Territory, it became necessary for it to procure certain additional tools, and pending the procuring of the same it was compelled to and did, suspend operations. That on April 1, 1907, it caused to be delivered to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company for shipment to it at Bristow…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Eddy v. LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Atchison, T. S. F. Ry. v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. TruskettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burlington Northern Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Railway Express Agency v. Huntress ex rel. Royal Ins. Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947