Ex parte Vance
California Supreme Court
Applications to the Supreme Court for discharge upon writs of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
These two proceedings were heard on Monday, March 9, 1891, on returns of the sheriff of Sacramento County to the writs of habeas corpus. The conclusions of this courty remanding the petitioners to the custody of said sheriff, were on the same day announced; but through some inadvertence, the proper orders were not delivered to the clerk, and were therefore not entered by him.
The petitioners are in custody by virtue of an order of the superior court of Sacramento County, — Judge A. P. Gatlin presiding, — punishing them for contempt, which consisted in violating a decree rendered in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hawk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- McFarland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ex Rel. Cameron v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1924
- Maloney v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 1904