Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1924No. S. F. No. 11041PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an application for a writ of review of an order adjudging petitioners, who are, respectively, the officers and attorney of the Tranquility Irrigation District, guilty of contempt of court for the violation of a judgment of injunction issued by respondent court in a proceeding instituted therein and entitled “Miller & Lux Incorporated, a corporation, and the San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Company Incorporated, a corporation, v. J. G. James Company, a corporation, and the San Joaquin Valley Farm Lands Company, a corporation, No. 2006 of the files of said court.”

On August…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Miller & Lux Inc. v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In Re BrambiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Livingston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hawk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API