Roosevelt City v. Nebeker
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Presiding Judge:
Defendant Ronald J. Nebeker appeals his conviction for violation of Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-44 (1988), Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol. We affirm.
At a bench trial, defendant objected to the admission into evidence of the City’s intoxilyzer affidavit and custodian certificate prepared by the Utah Department of Public Safety. This evidence attested to the accuracy of the intoxilyzer machine used to test defendant’s blood-alcohol content. Defendant objected on the ground that Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-44.3(3) 1 is in valid because it creates an unconstitutional…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Greaves v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. PreeceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- State v. PharrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991