Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pinholster v. Ayers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2009No. 03-99003, 03-99008Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge KOZINSKI,

with whom

Judges RYMER and KLEINFELD join, dissenting:

The California Supreme Court twice considered Pinholster’s claim that his death sentence be set aside because his lawyers performed ineffectively, and twice rejected that claim on the merits. Under *685AEDPA, those determinations come to us encased in a double layer of deference: first, the substantial deference to which lawyers are entitled under Strickland in making judgments during the course of their representation; and, second, the deference to which the state court is entitled in determining whether the lawyers’…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API