Pinholster v. Ayers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
Chief Judge KOZINSKI,
with whom
Judges RYMER and KLEINFELD join, dissenting:
The California Supreme Court twice considered Pinholster’s claim that his death sentence be set aside because his lawyers performed ineffectively, and twice rejected that claim on the merits. Under *685AEDPA, those determinations come to us encased in a double layer of deference: first, the substantial deference to which lawyers are entitled under Strickland in making judgments during the course of their representation; and, second, the deference to which the state court is entitled in determining whether the lawyers’…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.