Legal Opinion

Cussen v. Lynch

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 1922No. 2038. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Strike Out Statement of Pacts.

HUPP, C. J.

The appellee moves to strike out the statement of facts filed in this case: (1) Because pages 61 to 140 are duplicates of pages 1 to 61; (2) that pages l to 61 include all the testimony introduced on the defendant’s plea of abatement, which it is asserted should have been presented by a bill of exceptions; (3) that the agreement of counsel shows it was not agreed to as a statement of facts, but that it is a statement of the evidence admitted by the court upon both the plea in abatement and upon the merits; (4) because the trial judge did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roundtree v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Holmes v. CoalsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Stephens v. HerronTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. VickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Trevathan v. G. M. Hall & SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. NicholsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Schismatic & Purported Casa Linda Presbyterian Church in America v. Grace Union Presbytery, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  3. Cochrain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API