Legal Opinion
Simuel v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 2, 1998No. LR-C-97-892PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROY, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this case has appealed the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny her claims for supplemental security income (“SSI”)- Both sides have moved for summary judgment. In this judicial review, the Court must decide whether there is substantial evidence in the administrative record to support the Secretary’s decision. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1976 & Supp. V 1981).
The plaintiff applied for SSI on November 30, 1993. She alleged an inability to work since March 19, 1981. Her application was denied initially…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hubert Brand v. Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- James E. McMillian v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Attia v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
- Gaither v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024
- Gaither v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024