Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Pure Oil Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1946No. 5148PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This civil action, brought by the Price Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, is based upon allegations of overceiling sales of petroleum products, and prays for an injunction, mandatory relief, and judgment in the amount of $600,000.

The complaint, after formal allegations as to the parties and jurisdiction, cites the pertinent Regulation, avers that the defendant has violated the section requiring the keeping of records showing the basis upon which its maximum prices are determined and then in paragraph 7, states the whole cause of action as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Independence Shares Corporation v. DeckertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodman v. PolandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  2. Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. United States v. Koch Bros. Bag Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
  4. Snyder v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API