Legal Opinion

Leach v. Gunnarson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1980No. CA 13659, SC 26754PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*33HOWELL, J.

This action involves the question whether an irrevocable license to use a spring on a grantee’s land is a breach of the grantor’s covenant against encumbrances if the license is an open, notorious and visible physical encumbrance. Petitioners (hereinafter "plaintiffs”) are third-party plaintiffs seeking damages for breach of the warranty deed from their grantor, the third-party defendant (hereinafter "defendant”). It was established at trial that plaintiffs’ neighbors, Henry and Betty Leach (hereinafter "the Leaches”), have an irrevocable license to use and maintain a spring on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ford v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Estep v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Palmateer v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Corbett v. WrennOregon Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Berube v. NagleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. King v. TalcottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Polizos v. SkoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API