Legal Opinion

George Carocopos, Inc. v. James Chieves & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1922Published

1Opinion of the Court

Merrell, J.:

The actions were brought to recover- damages claimed to have been sustained by the plaintiff because of defendant’s refusal to accept 400 cases of Calamata Greek string figs, of about 130 pounds to the case, 1920 crop, contracted for by defendant at eleven and one-half cents per pound, c. i. f. New York, shipped in September, 1920, from Greece. The figs were sold by the plaintiff to the defendant under two separate written contracts substantially identical in form, one of which was dated August 17, 1920, and the other August 25, 1920. The actions were tried together and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mee v. . McNiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Smith Co. v. MoscahladesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Miller & Sons Co. v. E. M. Sergeant Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Schopflocher v. Essgee Co. of China, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API