Legal Opinion

Mee v. . McNider

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1888PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January Y, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict directed by the court. (Reported below,- 39 Hun, 145.) This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract of purchase of a quantity of cocoa.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January Y, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict directed by the court. (Reported below,- 39 Hun, 145.) This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract of purchase of a quantity of cocoa. Upon defendant’s refusal to receive and pay for the goods they were sold on his account, and the difference between the purchase-price and the net proceeds of sale plaintiff sought to recover. The material facts are stated…

1Opinion of the CourtDanforth, J.

The agreement between the parties was in these words : -

“ Hew York, Jamua/ry 3, 1882.
“ Sold for account of Mee, Billings & Co., London, to-James McUider, five hundred (500) bags prime fermented Bahia cocoa, at 59 s. per cwt., C. F. & L, by steamer to H. Y.,, buyers to furnish cable credit or pay bankers’ commission.
“ARTHUR R. EYTE,
“ Broker.”

Plaintiffs proved that 500 bags of cocoa of the quality and description specified were shipped on hoard a steamer which,, on arrival at Hew York, defendant refused to receive and pay for, because a portion had been wet and damaged on the voyage.

The answer…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mora Y Ledon v. . HavemeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Seaver v. . Lindsay Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Lamar Alfalfa Milling Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API