Legal Opinion

Difronzo v. Village of Port Sanilac

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1988No. Docket 97252PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of shorefront property in Port Sanilac, Michigan, which borders Lake Huron. Plaintiff appeals dismissal of his suit alleging, inter alia, inverse condemnation and trespass against defendants on the basis that the period of limitations had run. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff took title to the shoreland in 1968. The property had previously been used as a roller skating rink. In 1971, defendant Department of Natural Resources deeded to defendant Village of Port Sanilac unpatented Lake Huron bottom land located adjacent to plaintiffs property pursuant to the Great Lakes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Terlecki v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Horvath v. DelidaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Lopardo v. Fleming CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API