Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Barta

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1954No. 1556PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a finding and judgment of the lower court that appellee, Adolph K. Barta, was not obligated to pay appellant $1,375.00 for glasswork' furnished and installed in appellee’s home.

On November 27, 1951, appellee entered into a contract with the Manning-Winthrop Corporation, a general contractor, for the construction of a home on a cost plus fixed-fee basis. Under the terms and conditions of the contract, the general contractor was entitled to a stipulated fee of $6,500. Other pertinent articles and conditions provided:

Article 1: “The Contractor agrees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carruth v. Valley Ready-Mix Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Moody-Seagraves Ranch, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Dallas Nat. Bank v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. McDonald v. StoneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Gilbert Mfg. Co. v. ConnelleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. H. G. Smithy Co. v. Washington Medical Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Goodman v. WoodsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API