Legal Opinion

Commercial Corp. v. Krueger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Affidavits similar to that before us have been frequently upheld. In Silver Peak Mines v. Hanchett, 80 Fed. 990, the court in referring to an affidavit somewhat similar to the document before us tersely said:

“The point that is raised is purely technical in its character and it goes simply to the form, and not the substance, of the affidavit. The true interpretation to be given to that affidavit is that it is the affidavit of M. A. Murphy, who is the attorney for the corporation. It is not susceptible, in my judgment, of any other judicial interpretation.”

Similarly we believe that the document…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lyon v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. A. P. Hotaling & Co. v. BroganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Peters v. CrittendenTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Elramy v. . AbeyounisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paget v. PetersOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API