Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Hazen v. Maroney

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1963No. Civ. A. 63-260PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

The relator, John Hazen, presented a petition for habeas corpus and was granted leave to file same in forma pauperis. A rule to show cause issued and counsel was appointed for the relator. After consideration of the petition and the argument of Hazen’s counsel that a hearing should be held and testimony taken, it is our opinion that the rule should be discharged and the petition should be denied.

The petition and the answers filed by the respondent and the District Attorney of McKean County, Pennsylvania, show that the relator is confined in the State Correctional…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spencer v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Charles H. Plummer, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. TurcotteMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. United States Ex Rel. Gary v. HendrickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. United States Ex Rel. Fletcher v. MaroneyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Alden v. State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1964
  5. Hulett v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API