Legal Opinion

Hulett v. Sigler

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 30, 1965No. Civ. No. 810LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, District Judge.

The discretion vested in a prosecuting attorney in filing habitual criminal charges is without doubt an awesome weapon in the hands of law enforcement officials. Once more the use and/or non-use of the Nebraska recidivist statute brings before this court in a habeas corpus proceeding the question of whether a plea of guilty was coerced. Kenneth Hulett, an inmate in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, has invoked the jurisdiction of this court to consider the legality of his detention. Petitioner was convicted of burglary on his own plea, the voluntary nature…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ruben R. Cortez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Melvin Vaughn, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Warden of Clinton State Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Shupe v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1964
  4. McClure v. BolesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1964
  5. United States Ex Rel. Hazen v. MaroneyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Brown v. ParrattDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1976
  3. Burnside v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  4. Watkins v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1977
  5. McDonald v. MiddlebrooksDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API