Legal Opinion

Hirschberg v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eschweiler; J.

We think-the circuit court was clearly right in holding that the record discloses such contributory negligence by the plaintiff as must, as a matter of law, prevent her recovery against the defendant notwithstanding the jury’s finding that there was a want of proper lookout by the motorman. The plaintiff and her escort were crossing the street with full knowledge of the unusually limited space within which such a large object as an approaching street car could be expected to be seen, from having just seen the north-bound car passing on out of sight. Clearly such a situation…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zalewski v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Miller v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kroehler v. ArntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Saltzberg v. TaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Syslack v. Nevin Grocery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API