Hirschberg v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Eschweiler; J.
We think-the circuit court was clearly right in holding that the record discloses such contributory negligence by the plaintiff as must, as a matter of law, prevent her recovery against the defendant notwithstanding the jury’s finding that there was a want of proper lookout by the motorman. The plaintiff and her escort were crossing the street with full knowledge of the unusually limited space within which such a large object as an approaching street car could be expected to be seen, from having just seen the north-bound car passing on out of sight. Clearly such a situation…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Zalewski v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Miller v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
- Kroehler v. ArntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Saltzberg v. TaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Syslack v. Nevin Grocery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923