Saltzberg v. Tax
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
In his contention that there was m> negligence on the part of the defendant and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, the defendant’s counsel relies on the following cases: Feyrer v. Durbrow, 172 Wis. 71, 178 N. W. 306; Brickell v. Trecker, 176 Wis. 557, 186 N. W. 593; Hirschberg v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. 179 Wis. 175, 190 N. W. 829; Blazic v. Franzwa, 179 Wis. 260, 191 N. W. 572; Koperski v. Hoeft, 179 Wis. 281, 191 *376N. W. 571. In the first of these cases there was no evidence of excessive speed except the estimate of the plaintiff, a boy having no' experience in judging…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cunnien v. Superior Iron Works Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Enea v. PfisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Brickell v. TreckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Heucke v. Milwaukee City RailwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Feyrer v. DurbrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kroehler v. ArntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928