Legal Opinion

Saltzberg v. Tax

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

In his contention that there was m> negligence on the part of the defendant and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, the defendant’s counsel relies on the following cases: Feyrer v. Durbrow, 172 Wis. 71, 178 N. W. 306; Brickell v. Trecker, 176 Wis. 557, 186 N. W. 593; Hirschberg v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. 179 Wis. 175, 190 N. W. 829; Blazic v. Franzwa, 179 Wis. 260, 191 N. W. 572; Koperski v. Hoeft, 179 Wis. 281, 191 *376N. W. 571. In the first of these cases there was no evidence of excessive speed except the estimate of the plaintiff, a boy having no' experience in judging…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cunnien v. Superior Iron Works Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Enea v. PfisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brickell v. TreckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Heucke v. Milwaukee City RailwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Feyrer v. DurbrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kroehler v. ArntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API