Polk v. Grogan's Wholesale and Retail Lumber
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
TIREY, Justice.
This cause, (non jury) is one for accounting. At the conclusion of the testimony the trial court awarded the defendant judgment on its cross-action. In the Judgment we find this recital: * * * “the Court * * * is of the opinion that plaintiff, Reuben W. Polk, should take nothing by his cause of action as against all defendants, and is further of the opinion that cross-plaintiff, Grogan’s Wholesale & Retail Lumber should have and recover of and from the cross-defendant, Reuben W. Polk, its just damages in the sum of Sixty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Thirty-Eight and 42/100 Dollars…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Woodward v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Scott v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Davis v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farris v. Smith Erectors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Frankfurt's Texas Investment Corp. v. Trinity Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Laughlin v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Lynch v. Exxon Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Webb v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.