United States v. Morris
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
The defendant, through his Court-appointed counsel, Mr. David B. Harrison, moves this Court for an order directing a re-examination of the defendant under the provisions of Title 18, U.S.C. § 4244 et seq. In resistance to the motion the plaintiff appeared through Alfred V. Doutre, Assistant United States Attorney.
It appears that by order duly made and entered herein on April 23, 1956, the defendant was determined to be “presently mentally incompetent as to be unable to understand proceedings against him or properly to assist in his own defense in accordance to Secs. 4244…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wells, by Gillig v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Higgins v. McGrathDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. SettleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1960