Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. J. R. F.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2012No. CC 100350J; CA A147396; SC S059732PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

At issue in this dependency case is the lawfulness of an order of the juvenile court that requires a father not to interfere with the ability of a child who is a ward of the court to visit other children who live with father but are not wards of the court. The Court of Appeals concluded that the juvenile court possesses authority to enter the order under ORS 419B.337(3), which authorizes the court to “make an order regarding visitation by the ward’s parents or siblings.” Father in this case contends that the Court of Appeals erred in so concluding, because the order at issue does not involve…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Department of Human Services v. J. R. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Portland State University Chapter of the American Ass'n of University Professors v. Portland State UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gunderson, LLC v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Department of Human Services v. S. M.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Department of Human Services v. A. D. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Department of Human Services v. D. W. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API