Storm v. McClung
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff, the widow of Jon Storm and personal representative of his estate, brought this wrongful death action against the City of Oregon City (the City) for the benefit of Storm’s mother, Myrtha Storm, and his daughters, Sonia and Tami Storm. ORS 30.020. The City appeals from a judgment for plaintiff that was based on the jury’s finding that the City and Storm were each 50 percent negligent in Storm’s death. We hold that Sonia and Tami have each received a substantial remedy under the Workers’ Compensation Law and that plaintiff is not, therefore, entitled to any recovery on their behalf.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Evanhoff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Neher v. ChartierOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Davidson v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Storm v. McClungOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Lawson v. HokeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- David W. Cosgray v. State of New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026