Legal Opinion
Riccardi Wholesale Florists v. Rowe
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided March 25, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A., Rule 8A appeal by the defendants of the denial of their motion for relief from the summary judgment entered against them.2
The record indicates that individual defendant William Rowe (“Rowe”) purchased flowers and other goods from the plaintiff wholesaler for his store, Christopher’s Flowers. That business ceased operations in February, 1997, and no payments were made after that time on the account balance owed to the plaintiff. The plaintiff commenced this action against Rowe on May 13, 1997 to recover $5,500.00 for goods sold, plus costs and interest.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Cullen Enterprises, Inc. v. Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Bird v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Godfrey v. Woburn Foreign MotorsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Lashus v. SlaterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Andre v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Eyal Reporting Service, Inc. v. GouinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- Klessens v. DalyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.