Legal Opinion
Brady v. Murray
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered January 11, 2006, which denied the motion by defendants Murray and 667 E. 187th St. to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
It does not “conclusively appear” that plaintiffs “had knowledge of facts from which the fraud could reasonably be inferred” (Trepuk v Frank, 44 NY2d 723, 725 [1978]). In addition, the parties’ sharply conflicting affidavits “preclude summary resolution of the statute of limitations issue” (Saphir Intl., SA v UBS PaineWebber Inc., 25 AD3d 315, 316 [2006]).
Contrary to defendants’ claim,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Morse Shoe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Saphir International, SA v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- 172 East 122 Street Tenants Ass'n v. SchwarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Tok Hwai Koo v. Robert Koo Wine & Liquor, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duberstein v. National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Srivatsa v. Rosetta Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Srivatsa v. Rosetta Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023