Legal Opinion

Saphir International, SA v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 2006PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered June 10, 2004, which granted the separate motions of defendants UBS PaineWebber Inc., Rani Merkel, Alberto Muro and Leon Lipkin to dismiss the amended complaint against them as barred by the statute of limitations, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motions denied and the amended complaint reinstated.

An action alleging a cause of action for fraud must be commenced within six years from the time of the fraud or within two years from the time the fraud was discovered or, with reasonable diligence, could have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Ghandour v. Shearson Lehman Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. K&E Trading & Shipping, Inc. v. Radmar Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Miller v. PolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Lavin v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Valentini v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Financial Structures Ltd. v. UBS AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. CSAM Capital, Inc. v. LauderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Hunt v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Citicorp Trust Bank v. MakkasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API