Legal Opinion

Bourgeois v. Strawn

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 7, 2007No. 05-10020Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

LAWSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Roland J. Bourgeois, filed a complaint seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law on the grounds that he had been arrested in violation of the Fourth Amendment and applicable state law when defendant Larn Strawn, along with the other state law enforcement officials, executed an arrest warrant on another individual wanted for various livestock crimes. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant. Believing that he is entitled to a judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API