Legal Opinion

Archdiocese of Washington v. Moersen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 14, 2007No. 69 September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The central issue in this case involves whether an organist for a Catholic church falls within the Title VII “ministerial exception,” a legal exception carved out in deference to the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment that precludes government interference, or judicial involvement, in the employment decisions of religious organizations. We shall hold that, under the facts of this case, an organist holding a position similar to that occupied by the respondent does not *640come within the ministerial exception. Thus, he may prosecute a Title VII claim.

A

The First…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weishuhn v. Catholic Diocese of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Doe v. Catholic Relief ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Cooper v. Church of St. BenedictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Jesus Christ is the Answer Ministries, Inc. v. Balt. Cnty.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  5. Shaarei Tfiloh v. Mayor & Council of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API