Legal Opinion

Zidek v. West Penn Power Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1941No. Appeal, 116PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kenworthey, J.,

Opinion by

In this, negligence case, defendant, appeals from a refusal to grant its motion for judgment n. o. y. Its contention is that prior to the institution of suit, it had made a settlement of this claim with an attorney representing plaintiff.

The facts are undisputed. The accident happened January 21, 1937, and thereafter plaintiff executed and ■delivered to an attorney an irrevocable power in which she authorized him to “either settle, adjust, enter suit, pursue said suit in the proper courts or otherwise dispose of her claim......Said attorney to receive as compensation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. First National Bank v. Colonial Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Culver v. Pocono Spring Water Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Englerth v. BattersbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Netter v. LoganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kenerson v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Zidek v. Forbes National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Savidge v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. The Florida Bar v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API