Legal Opinion
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. City of Milwaukee
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 30, 2003No. 02CV007447; 02CV007448; 02CV007449; 02CV007450; 02CV007451; 02CV007452; 02CV007453; 02CV007454; 02CV007455; 02CV007456; 02CV007457; 02CV007458; 02CV007459; 02CV007460; 02CV007461; 02CV007462; 02CV007463; 02CV007464; 02CV007465; 02CV007466; 02CV007467; 03-0724PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
¶ 1. Fourteen City of Milwaukee property-taxpayers appeal an order dismissing their actions brought under Wis. Stat. § 74.37 against the City for property-tax refunds. Before Nankin v. Village of Shorewood, 2001 WI 92, 245 Wis. 2d 86, 630 N.W.2d 141, § 74.37 could only be used to challenge tax assessments on property located outside of Milwaukee County. Nankin declared this restriction to be unconstitutional.
¶ 2. The trial court granted the City's motion to dismiss these consolidated cases. It held that despite Nankin, Wis. Stat. § 74.37 could not be used to challenge tax assessments on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Truttschel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- City of Milwaukee v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Metropolitan Associates v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Haferman v. St. Clare Healthcare Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.