Legal Opinion
Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 7, 2011No. Case No. 2009AP1212; Case No. 2010AP491PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
¶ 1. This matter was here before. Estate of Kriefall ex rel. Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc., 2003 WI App 119, ¶ 1, 265 Wis. 2d 476, 483, 665 N.W.2d 417, 421, held that claims by the estate of a child alleged to have died as the result of, and persons alleged to be injured by, contaminated meat sold by Excel Corporation were not barred by federal preemption. The claims of the Kriefalls and the others alleged to be injured by the meat were settled. This appeal concerns disputes between the Sizzler parties and Excel.
¶ 2. The parties to this appeal are:
• Excel and its insurer, American…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Nickel v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Aesthetic & Cosmetic Plastic Surgery Center, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- Miller v. American Art Clay Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.