Legal Opinion
Doe v. Alsaud
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 3, 2014No. 13 Civ. 571PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Saudi Oger Ltd. (“Saudi Oger”) has moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”) filed by plaintiff Jane Doe (the “Plaintiff’) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Based upon the conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted, and the FAC is dismissed.
Prior Proceedings
Plaintiff filed her original complaint on January 25, 2013. On February 14, 2013, *676Plaintiff filed an affidavit of service claiming to have served “Saudi Oger Ltd. d/b/a Hariri Interests” on…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Riviello v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Chau v. DonovanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- De Sole v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Benacquista v. SprattDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Rosenfeld v. LenichDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Pearce v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2015
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.