People v. Grainger
Michigan Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceBronson, J.
I concur in the majority’s decision to reverse this case. I generally agree with the majority’s statement of the facts. However, I believe additional explication is necessary to resolve the constitutional issues raised and will set forth these additional facts with the analysis sections of my opinion. I disagree that the facts of this case support the majority’s conclusion that the search and seizure conducted here was constitutionally permissible.
I
The prosecution does not dispute defendant’s assertion that the search and seizure here came within the purview of both the Fourth Amendment to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.