Legal Opinion
A/S Skaugaas v. The T/T P. W. Thirtle
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 2, 1964No. Adm. Nos. 4469, 4474PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
'These consolidated libels, cross-claims and petitions arise out of a collision in Fort McHenry Channel in Baltimore Harbor between the inbound ore-carrier Skaustrand and the outbound steam tanker Thirtle. At the time of the collision Thirtle was completing a right turn from Curtis Bay Channel into Fort McHenry Channel around the dredge Cartagena, which was spudded and anchored in the west1 (outbound) half of Fort McHenry Channel a short distance below Curtis Bay Channel. See attached sketch. The ■Court has found, on conflicting evidence, that Skaustrand and Thirtle…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The Ludvig HolbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Al Johnson Construction Co. v. S.S. Rio OrinocoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Isthmian Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1970
- Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. A Vessel Hong Kong ClipperDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
- Maritrans Operating Partners L.P. v. M/T Faith IDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- In Re Tug Management CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.