Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Hanna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reason, as noted by Special Term, that section 20 of the Utica City Charter (L 1862, ch 18, as amd by L 1876, ch 371, § 7; L 1899, ch 282, § 1; L 1953, ch 878, § 301) limits the rights of the boards, departments, and officers who are to be advised by the Corporation Counsel to employ outside counsel, but does not limit the right of the Corporation Counsel to do so. Section 20, therefore, does not conflict with or limit section 201 of the Second Class Cities Law (L 1906, ch 473, § 201, as amd by L 1921, ch 363, § 1),…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Maksuti v. Best Italian PizzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Angulo v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Angulo v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API