Legal Opinion

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Fidler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 2002PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this declaratory judgment action, Erie Insurance Exchange (Erie) asks the court to determine if it owes a duty to defend or to indemnify its insureds, Matthew P. Fidler, Paul A. Fidler, Jr. or Ruth Naomi Fidler in a tort action instituted by Merrill T. Denslow, IV, Merrill T. Den-slow, III and Paula E. Denslow (appellants). The court found in favor of appel-lee Erie. We affirm.

¶ 2 In the underlying action, appellants, the Denslows, filed a tort action against Matthew P. Fidler, for damages sustained by appellant Merrill Tracy Denslow, IV, when he was physically…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Mutual Benefit Insurance v. HaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Gene's Restaurant, Inc. v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Germantown Insurance v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Exchange v. MuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. QBE Insurance v. M & S Landis Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. American National Property & Casualty Companies v. HearnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Westport Insurance v. Black, Davis & Shue Agency, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Feldman Law Group P.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API